<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (8) TMI 511 - CESTAT,  MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114075</link>
    <description>Filing a declaration under the Modvat scheme was treated as a substantive statutory condition, and credit taken before compliance could not be sustained where the declaration was filed only after an inordinate delay of about three years. The prolonged lapse was viewed as showing indifference to the prescribed procedure, and no legal basis was found to condone the delay. The Modvat credit was therefore denied.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Aug 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 May 2012 10:11:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=151081" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (8) TMI 511 - CESTAT,  MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114075</link>
      <description>Filing a declaration under the Modvat scheme was treated as a substantive statutory condition, and credit taken before compliance could not be sustained where the declaration was filed only after an inordinate delay of about three years. The prolonged lapse was viewed as showing indifference to the prescribed procedure, and no legal basis was found to condone the delay. The Modvat credit was therefore denied.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Aug 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114075</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>