<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (12) TMI 296 - High Court of Bombay</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114069</link>
    <description>The court held that the 45-day limitation period for filing an appeal under Section 17 of the NPA Act starts from the date of actual possession. It also held that the provisions of the Limitation Act, including Section 5, are applicable to proceedings under Section 17(1) of the NPA Act. The petition was disposed of accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2014 12:49:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=151075" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (12) TMI 296 - High Court of Bombay</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114069</link>
      <description>The court held that the 45-day limitation period for filing an appeal under Section 17 of the NPA Act starts from the date of actual possession. It also held that the provisions of the Limitation Act, including Section 5, are applicable to proceedings under Section 17(1) of the NPA Act. The petition was disposed of accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114069</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>