<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (12) TMI 295 - High Court of Andhra Pradesh</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114068</link>
    <description>Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act does not require a separate pre-application notice under Section 13(4) before the secured creditor seeks Magistrate assistance to take possession of secured assets. The statutory scheme treats Section 13(2) as the demand notice stage and Section 13(4) as the stage for creditor measures, while Section 14 operates as a non-adjudicatory aid to possession and not as an independent notice-triggering provision. Challenges to the creditor&#039;s measures remain available under Section 17, and the existence of alternative remedies and related civil proceedings reinforced the refusal to treat the absence of a Section 13(4) notice as fatal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2014 11:46:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=151074" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (12) TMI 295 - High Court of Andhra Pradesh</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114068</link>
      <description>Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act does not require a separate pre-application notice under Section 13(4) before the secured creditor seeks Magistrate assistance to take possession of secured assets. The statutory scheme treats Section 13(2) as the demand notice stage and Section 13(4) as the stage for creditor measures, while Section 14 operates as a non-adjudicatory aid to possession and not as an independent notice-triggering provision. Challenges to the creditor&#039;s measures remain available under Section 17, and the existence of alternative remedies and related civil proceedings reinforced the refusal to treat the absence of a Section 13(4) notice as fatal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114068</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>