https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114066 A writ petition asserting tenancy rights against measures under the securitisation process was not entertained because no acceptable material was produced to substantiate the alleged tenancy. The Court also noted the availability of alternative statutory remedies and held that the dispute was not suitable for effective adjudication in writ proceedings. The petitioner was therefore left to pursue the remedies available in law. en-us Fri, 02 Nov 2007 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 20 Dec 2014 11:02:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114066 A writ petition asserting tenancy rights against measures under the securitisation process was not entertained because no acceptable material was produced to substantiate the alleged tenancy. The Court also noted the availability of alternative statutory remedies and held that the dispute was not suitable for effective adjudication in writ proceedings. The petitioner was therefore left to pursue the remedies available in law. Case-Laws Companies Law Fri, 02 Nov 2007 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114066