https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114064 The High Court quashed the orders of the Debt Recovery Tribunal and Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal, ruling that the denial of the petitioners' request for cross-examination of the Bank Manager was a legal error. The petitioners were allowed to cross-examine the Bank Manager to ensure a fair resolution of the disputes. The court granted the petitioners the liberty to conduct the cross-examination in accordance with the law, emphasizing the importance of procedural fairness in adjudication. Each party was directed to bear their own costs. en-us Wed, 10 Oct 2007 00:00:00 +0530 Sun, 21 Dec 2014 20:52:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114064 The High Court quashed the orders of the Debt Recovery Tribunal and Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal, ruling that the denial of the petitioners' request for cross-examination of the Bank Manager was a legal error. The petitioners were allowed to cross-examine the Bank Manager to ensure a fair resolution of the disputes. The court granted the petitioners the liberty to conduct the cross-examination in accordance with the law, emphasizing the importance of procedural fairness in adjudication. Each party was directed to bear their own costs. Case-Laws Companies Law Wed, 10 Oct 2007 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114064