<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (6) TMI 589 - HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114059</link>
    <description>The Company Law Board&#039;s direction to convene and authorise an annual general meeting under the Companies Act, 1956 was upheld because it was based on the factual position that no board of directors existed. The meeting was thereafter held through an appointed chairman, fresh directors were appointed, and charge was handed over. As no error apparent on the record or legal infirmity was shown, the High Court found no substantial question of law and declined interference.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 May 2012 16:21:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=151065" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (6) TMI 589 - HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114059</link>
      <description>The Company Law Board&#039;s direction to convene and authorise an annual general meeting under the Companies Act, 1956 was upheld because it was based on the factual position that no board of directors existed. The meeting was thereafter held through an appointed chairman, fresh directors were appointed, and charge was handed over. As no error apparent on the record or legal infirmity was shown, the High Court found no substantial question of law and declined interference.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114059</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>