<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (6) TMI 588 - HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114058</link>
    <description>Section 454(2) of the Companies Act, 1956 operates independently of section 454(1) and may be invoked by the official liquidator against an ex-director or other qualifying person, even if that person was deleted in earlier proceedings under section 454(5). The Karnataka High Court held that such deletion did not bar a fresh request under the enabling provision, provided the person falls within the statutory category. On the record, the respondent&#039;s post-winding-up participation, signing of minutes, and correspondence with the official liquidator supplied sufficient material to justify requiring the statement of affairs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2014 09:36:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=151064" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (6) TMI 588 - HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114058</link>
      <description>Section 454(2) of the Companies Act, 1956 operates independently of section 454(1) and may be invoked by the official liquidator against an ex-director or other qualifying person, even if that person was deleted in earlier proceedings under section 454(5). The Karnataka High Court held that such deletion did not bar a fresh request under the enabling provision, provided the person falls within the statutory category. On the record, the respondent&#039;s post-winding-up participation, signing of minutes, and correspondence with the official liquidator supplied sufficient material to justify requiring the statement of affairs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114058</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>