<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (4) TMI 460 - HIGH COURT OF PATNA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114049</link>
    <description>The court found that the ex-directors failed to submit the statement of affairs after a winding up order, did not cooperate with the Official Liquidator, and made misleading claims about resignation and company assets. Despite their assertions, the court held the ex-directors accountable for intentional non-compliance and evasion of duties. The court dismissed their claims, emphasizing their obligations to cooperate and face further criminal proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2014 15:07:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=151055" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (4) TMI 460 - HIGH COURT OF PATNA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114049</link>
      <description>The court found that the ex-directors failed to submit the statement of affairs after a winding up order, did not cooperate with the Official Liquidator, and made misleading claims about resignation and company assets. Despite their assertions, the court held the ex-directors accountable for intentional non-compliance and evasion of duties. The court dismissed their claims, emphasizing their obligations to cooperate and face further criminal proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114049</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>