https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114045 The court held that Section 22(1) of SICA does not prevent the recovery of workmen's compensation under the Workmen's Compensation Act. The employer's attempt to stall payment citing SICA was rejected, emphasizing the workman's right to prompt compensation. The writ petition was granted, directing the respondents to recover the amount within three months. This decision highlights the precedence of workmen's statutory rights over protective provisions for sick companies under SICA. en-us Wed, 04 Mar 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 15 Nov 2014 10:34:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114045 The court held that Section 22(1) of SICA does not prevent the recovery of workmen's compensation under the Workmen's Compensation Act. The employer's attempt to stall payment citing SICA was rejected, emphasizing the workman's right to prompt compensation. The writ petition was granted, directing the respondents to recover the amount within three months. This decision highlights the precedence of workmen's statutory rights over protective provisions for sick companies under SICA. Case-Laws Companies Law Wed, 04 Mar 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114045