<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (2) TMI 472 - HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114041</link>
    <description>The court concluded that the scheme proposed by the ex-promoters of Mardia Steel Ltd. was not just, fair, or proper. It appeared to be an attempt to transfer the company&#039;s assets to close relatives of the promoters without adequate provisions for discharging liabilities. The court dismissed all three petitions and directed the official liquidator to proceed with the disposal of the company&#039;s assets.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2014 17:05:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=151047" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (2) TMI 472 - HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114041</link>
      <description>The court concluded that the scheme proposed by the ex-promoters of Mardia Steel Ltd. was not just, fair, or proper. It appeared to be an attempt to transfer the company&#039;s assets to close relatives of the promoters without adequate provisions for discharging liabilities. The court dismissed all three petitions and directed the official liquidator to proceed with the disposal of the company&#039;s assets.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114041</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>