<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (1) TMI 496 - HIGH COURT OF MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114040</link>
    <description>The court held that the ex-directors were not liable for the tax arrears of the company under the TNGST Act or CST Act. The notice issued to them was deemed invalid due to misconceptions and lack of jurisdiction. The court allowed the writ petition and appeal, setting aside the notice and interim order, while leaving room for potential action under other laws.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2014 12:25:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=151046" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (1) TMI 496 - HIGH COURT OF MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114040</link>
      <description>The court held that the ex-directors were not liable for the tax arrears of the company under the TNGST Act or CST Act. The notice issued to them was deemed invalid due to misconceptions and lack of jurisdiction. The court allowed the writ petition and appeal, setting aside the notice and interim order, while leaving room for potential action under other laws.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114040</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>