https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114038 The court allowed the plaintiff to amend the plaint to include the plea of lifting the corporate veil to hold defendant Nos. 2 and 3 personally liable for fraudulent acts. The application for deletion of defendant No. 2's name was dismissed as infructuous due to the allowed amendment. The court emphasized the wide power to allow amendments in the interests of justice and to avoid unnecessary litigation. Further proceedings were scheduled for completion of pleadings and pending applications. en-us Mon, 19 Jan 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 20 Nov 2014 09:32:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114038 The court allowed the plaintiff to amend the plaint to include the plea of lifting the corporate veil to hold defendant Nos. 2 and 3 personally liable for fraudulent acts. The application for deletion of defendant No. 2's name was dismissed as infructuous due to the allowed amendment. The court emphasized the wide power to allow amendments in the interests of justice and to avoid unnecessary litigation. Further proceedings were scheduled for completion of pleadings and pending applications. Case-Laws Companies Law Mon, 19 Jan 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114038