<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (1) TMI 493 - HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114037</link>
    <description>The court ruled in favor of the secured creditor, Bank of India, directing the official liquidator to remit Rs. 2 crores with interest from the sale proceeds of the company&#039;s assets in liquidation. The court held that the creditor&#039;s right to enforcement against security is distinct and not subject to discretionary considerations, rejecting the official liquidator&#039;s argument based on a Supreme Court decision. Emphasizing the exclusive jurisdiction of the Debts Recovery Tribunal, the judgment highlighted the importance of efficient debt recovery processes during liquidation and upheld the creditor&#039;s claim for payment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2014 11:10:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=151043" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (1) TMI 493 - HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114037</link>
      <description>The court ruled in favor of the secured creditor, Bank of India, directing the official liquidator to remit Rs. 2 crores with interest from the sale proceeds of the company&#039;s assets in liquidation. The court held that the creditor&#039;s right to enforcement against security is distinct and not subject to discretionary considerations, rejecting the official liquidator&#039;s argument based on a Supreme Court decision. Emphasizing the exclusive jurisdiction of the Debts Recovery Tribunal, the judgment highlighted the importance of efficient debt recovery processes during liquidation and upheld the creditor&#039;s claim for payment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114037</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>