<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (12) TMI 408 - HIGH COURT OF MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114035</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the petition for winding up, as the petitioner failed to prove the respondent-company&#039;s commercial insolvency or the enforceability of the English Court decree in India. The court suggested pursuing other legal remedies for enforcement and ruled in favor of the respondent, with no costs awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2014 13:54:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=151041" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (12) TMI 408 - HIGH COURT OF MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114035</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the petition for winding up, as the petitioner failed to prove the respondent-company&#039;s commercial insolvency or the enforceability of the English Court decree in India. The court suggested pursuing other legal remedies for enforcement and ruled in favor of the respondent, with no costs awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114035</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>