<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (12) TMI 407 - HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114034</link>
    <description>The High Court set aside the previous order and directed the Board for Industrial and Financial Reconstruction (BIFR) to reassess the company&#039;s viability for rehabilitation, considering its improved financial position and settlements with creditors. The BIFR was instructed to review the necessity of winding up, ensuring settlement of employees&#039; dues, while the official liquidator retained possession of the company&#039;s assets pending the Board&#039;s decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2014 12:29:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=151040" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (12) TMI 407 - HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114034</link>
      <description>The High Court set aside the previous order and directed the Board for Industrial and Financial Reconstruction (BIFR) to reassess the company&#039;s viability for rehabilitation, considering its improved financial position and settlements with creditors. The BIFR was instructed to review the necessity of winding up, ensuring settlement of employees&#039; dues, while the official liquidator retained possession of the company&#039;s assets pending the Board&#039;s decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114034</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>