<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (10) TMI 360 - HIGH COURT OF MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114028</link>
    <description>A private assignee of a bank&#039;s security interest does not become a secured creditor under the SARFAESI Act merely by assignment, so it cannot invoke the Act&#039;s special enforcement powers or support possession for a lessee on that basis. Where later assignment, sub-mortgage and lease arrangements are independently challenged as fraudulent and extend beyond the bank&#039;s original recovery steps, civil court jurisdiction is not ousted by the SARFAESI Act or the RDDBFI Act. The note also records that a receiver may continue in possession to preserve the asset pending further orders, and that a court-supervised e-auction sale of the theatre complex may be directed to balance liabilities, protect value and avoid further litigation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2014 14:52:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=151034" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (10) TMI 360 - HIGH COURT OF MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114028</link>
      <description>A private assignee of a bank&#039;s security interest does not become a secured creditor under the SARFAESI Act merely by assignment, so it cannot invoke the Act&#039;s special enforcement powers or support possession for a lessee on that basis. Where later assignment, sub-mortgage and lease arrangements are independently challenged as fraudulent and extend beyond the bank&#039;s original recovery steps, civil court jurisdiction is not ousted by the SARFAESI Act or the RDDBFI Act. The note also records that a receiver may continue in possession to preserve the asset pending further orders, and that a court-supervised e-auction sale of the theatre complex may be directed to balance liabilities, protect value and avoid further litigation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114028</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>