https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114027 The Tribunal allowed the stay application, halting recovery pending appeal, as it found the items "Primosa" and "Simrose" did not align with Chapter 21 descriptions. The appellants' argument that the items were dietary food supplements classified under Chapter 15 was upheld, rejecting the Commissioner's classification under Chapter 21. Coercive recovery measures under Chapter 21 were prohibited until the final hearing. en-us Wed, 11 Aug 2004 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 09 May 2012 18:35:48 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114027 The Tribunal allowed the stay application, halting recovery pending appeal, as it found the items "Primosa" and "Simrose" did not align with Chapter 21 descriptions. The appellants' argument that the items were dietary food supplements classified under Chapter 15 was upheld, rejecting the Commissioner's classification under Chapter 21. Coercive recovery measures under Chapter 21 were prohibited until the final hearing. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 11 Aug 2004 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114027