<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (10) TMI 359 - HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114024</link>
    <description>The court dismissed both the appeal and the arbitration application, finding no error in the Single Judge&#039;s order. The appellants failed to prove the existence of a valid arbitration agreement, leading to the denial of relief under Sections 9 and 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The court also rejected the appellants&#039; request for a stay of the order due to the lack of prior interim relief and potential harm to the respondents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2014 16:03:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=151030" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (10) TMI 359 - HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114024</link>
      <description>The court dismissed both the appeal and the arbitration application, finding no error in the Single Judge&#039;s order. The appellants failed to prove the existence of a valid arbitration agreement, leading to the denial of relief under Sections 9 and 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The court also rejected the appellants&#039; request for a stay of the order due to the lack of prior interim relief and potential harm to the respondents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114024</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>