https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114022 The Tribunal found that the appellants were entitled to the benefit of the cum-duty price rule in determining duty liability, despite the lack of specific direction in the remand order. Citing legal precedents, the Tribunal emphasized that any benefit available under the law must be granted to the assessee. As a result, the impugned order was set aside, and the matter was remanded to the adjudicating authority to quantify the duty after allowing the benefit of cum-duty prices to the appellants. The appeal was disposed of in favor of the appellants. en-us Tue, 03 Aug 2004 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 09 May 2012 18:22:12 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114022 The Tribunal found that the appellants were entitled to the benefit of the cum-duty price rule in determining duty liability, despite the lack of specific direction in the remand order. Citing legal precedents, the Tribunal emphasized that any benefit available under the law must be granted to the assessee. As a result, the impugned order was set aside, and the matter was remanded to the adjudicating authority to quantify the duty after allowing the benefit of cum-duty prices to the appellants. The appeal was disposed of in favor of the appellants. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 03 Aug 2004 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114022