<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (9) TMI 573 - HIGH COURT OF ORISSA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114019</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the winding up petition, emphasizing the existence of a bona fide dispute over payment for supplied materials and the necessity to adhere to the arbitration clause in the agreement for resolution. The court highlighted that the dispute should be settled through arbitration as per the contractual terms, and the dismissal of the petition did not preclude the petitioner from seeking other legal remedies for resolution.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2014 17:42:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=151025" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (9) TMI 573 - HIGH COURT OF ORISSA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114019</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the winding up petition, emphasizing the existence of a bona fide dispute over payment for supplied materials and the necessity to adhere to the arbitration clause in the agreement for resolution. The court highlighted that the dispute should be settled through arbitration as per the contractual terms, and the dismissal of the petition did not preclude the petitioner from seeking other legal remedies for resolution.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114019</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>