<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (7) TMI 530 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114011</link>
    <description>The Tribunal annulled the demand for duty and penalty against the appellants, underscoring that assumptions and suspicions cannot substitute for legal proof. The matter concerning the shortage of ferro manganese was remanded to the jurisdictional Adjudicating Authority for further examination, requiring concrete evidence rather than speculative assertions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Jun 2024 17:31:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=151017" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (7) TMI 530 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114011</link>
      <description>The Tribunal annulled the demand for duty and penalty against the appellants, underscoring that assumptions and suspicions cannot substitute for legal proof. The matter concerning the shortage of ferro manganese was remanded to the jurisdictional Adjudicating Authority for further examination, requiring concrete evidence rather than speculative assertions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114011</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>