https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114003 The appellate tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants in a case involving duty demand on texturised yarn under the DEEC Scheme. The duty demand and penalty imposed were set aside as the appellants' role as supporting manufacturers for another entity was acknowledged, and there was no evidence of diversion to the domestic market. The tribunal concluded that there was no justification for imposing duty on the exported goods, allowing the appeal and determining that no penalty was warranted. en-us Tue, 20 Jul 2004 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 09 May 2012 17:25:22 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114003 The appellate tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants in a case involving duty demand on texturised yarn under the DEEC Scheme. The duty demand and penalty imposed were set aside as the appellants' role as supporting manufacturers for another entity was acknowledged, and there was no evidence of diversion to the domestic market. The tribunal concluded that there was no justification for imposing duty on the exported goods, allowing the appeal and determining that no penalty was warranted. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 20 Jul 2004 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114003