<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (7) TMI 523 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113999</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the denial of Modvat credit for lubricants due to non-defacement of manufacturers&#039; invoices by the dealer, citing unjustifiability in solely relying on this omission without issuing a show-cause notice. The appellant&#039;s utilization of duty-paid lubricants without discrepancies in the dealer&#039;s invoices was confirmed, leading to the appeal being allowed and Modvat credit of Rs. 58,215 granted for the lubricants procured.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Jul 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 May 2012 17:20:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=151005" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (7) TMI 523 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113999</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the denial of Modvat credit for lubricants due to non-defacement of manufacturers&#039; invoices by the dealer, citing unjustifiability in solely relying on this omission without issuing a show-cause notice. The appellant&#039;s utilization of duty-paid lubricants without discrepancies in the dealer&#039;s invoices was confirmed, leading to the appeal being allowed and Modvat credit of Rs. 58,215 granted for the lubricants procured.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Jul 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113999</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>