https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113989 The Supreme Court allowed the appeal against the Calcutta High Court's Division Bench order vacating an interim order in a case involving a Frame Agreement and arbitration agreement. The Court directed thorough examination of the issue based on pleadings and documents, instructing respondent No. 1 to file a reply within two weeks. Emphasizing comprehensive review for justice, the Supreme Court mandated the division bench to decide on the injunction application within eight weeks, setting aside the previous order. The interim order was to continue for three months or until the division bench's decision, with parties having the option to approach the Supreme Court if the timeline was not met. en-us Thu, 29 Oct 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 13 Aug 2013 10:21:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113989 The Supreme Court allowed the appeal against the Calcutta High Court's Division Bench order vacating an interim order in a case involving a Frame Agreement and arbitration agreement. The Court directed thorough examination of the issue based on pleadings and documents, instructing respondent No. 1 to file a reply within two weeks. Emphasizing comprehensive review for justice, the Supreme Court mandated the division bench to decide on the injunction application within eight weeks, setting aside the previous order. The interim order was to continue for three months or until the division bench's decision, with parties having the option to approach the Supreme Court if the timeline was not met. Case-Laws Companies Law Thu, 29 Oct 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113989