https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113981 The Supreme Court set aside the judgment of the High Court in response to a writ petition seeking mandamus for the release of a loan amount and damages for breach of contract. The Court found the writ petition misconceived as it exceeded the scope of a writ petition by seeking enforcement of contractual commitments. The Court emphasized the need for proper pleadings and scrutiny by High Courts in such cases, ultimately allowing the appeal and highlighting that contractual disputes should not be entertained through writ petitions. en-us Thu, 22 Oct 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 13 Aug 2013 10:27:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113981 The Supreme Court set aside the judgment of the High Court in response to a writ petition seeking mandamus for the release of a loan amount and damages for breach of contract. The Court found the writ petition misconceived as it exceeded the scope of a writ petition by seeking enforcement of contractual commitments. The Court emphasized the need for proper pleadings and scrutiny by High Courts in such cases, ultimately allowing the appeal and highlighting that contractual disputes should not be entertained through writ petitions. Case-Laws Companies Law Thu, 22 Oct 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113981