https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113977 A partnership dispute involving alleged retirement, reconstitution of the firm, and serious claims of fraud, manipulation and account irregularities was found unsuitable for arbitration because it required detailed examination of documentary and oral evidence. The civil court was therefore not bound to refer the matter to an arbitrator. The section 8 application also failed because the original partnership deed containing the arbitration clause was not produced, and the later reconstituted deed did not cure that defect. The suit was directed to proceed before the trial court for adjudication on evidence. en-us Thu, 22 Oct 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 06 Aug 2016 12:10:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113977 A partnership dispute involving alleged retirement, reconstitution of the firm, and serious claims of fraud, manipulation and account irregularities was found unsuitable for arbitration because it required detailed examination of documentary and oral evidence. The civil court was therefore not bound to refer the matter to an arbitrator. The section 8 application also failed because the original partnership deed containing the arbitration clause was not produced, and the later reconstituted deed did not cure that defect. The suit was directed to proceed before the trial court for adjudication on evidence. Case-Laws Companies Law Thu, 22 Oct 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113977