<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (10) TMI 534 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113977</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal, upholding the decisions of the lower courts. The court directed the trial court to dispose of the suit within six months and allowed the parties to present evidence to support their claims. The court emphasized that serious allegations of fraud and misappropriation required a detailed examination of evidence, which was beyond the scope of arbitration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 Aug 2016 12:10:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=150983" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (10) TMI 534 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113977</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal, upholding the decisions of the lower courts. The court directed the trial court to dispose of the suit within six months and allowed the parties to present evidence to support their claims. The court emphasized that serious allegations of fraud and misappropriation required a detailed examination of evidence, which was beyond the scope of arbitration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113977</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>