<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (7) TMI 510 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113972</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, New Delhi dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal against the order-in-appeal. The issue concerned the charging of temporary registration cost by the respondents. The Tribunal upheld the order, stating that the registration fee was optional and unrelated to the manufacturing of the motor vehicle.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 Jul 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 May 2012 15:45:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=150978" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (7) TMI 510 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113972</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, New Delhi dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal against the order-in-appeal. The issue concerned the charging of temporary registration cost by the respondents. The Tribunal upheld the order, stating that the registration fee was optional and unrelated to the manufacturing of the motor vehicle.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Jul 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113972</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>