<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (10) TMI 527 - High Court of Punjab &amp; Haryana</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113963</link>
    <description>The appeal seeking post-sale approval of a property belonging to a company in liquidation was dismissed. The court found the sale transaction during winding up proceedings to be invalid without court approval, emphasizing the need for compliance with official liquidator involvement and tribunal directives. The court scrutinized the bona fides of the sale and settlement, noting potential fraudulent intent. Emphasizing adherence to Companies Act provisions, the court upheld the lower court&#039;s decision, highlighting the importance of legitimate transactions benefiting the company and creditors. Costs were imposed on the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2014 18:42:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=150969" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (10) TMI 527 - High Court of Punjab &amp; Haryana</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113963</link>
      <description>The appeal seeking post-sale approval of a property belonging to a company in liquidation was dismissed. The court found the sale transaction during winding up proceedings to be invalid without court approval, emphasizing the need for compliance with official liquidator involvement and tribunal directives. The court scrutinized the bona fides of the sale and settlement, noting potential fraudulent intent. Emphasizing adherence to Companies Act provisions, the court upheld the lower court&#039;s decision, highlighting the importance of legitimate transactions benefiting the company and creditors. Costs were imposed on the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113963</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>