<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (10) TMI 526 - HIGH COURT OF MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113962</link>
    <description>The winding-up petition was found not maintainable as the petitioner had initiated arbitration proceedings, indicating a genuine dispute over the debt. The court emphasized the need for the debt to be determined and recognized the respondent&#039;s substantial and bona fide defense. Referring to legal precedents, the court held that since arbitration had commenced, the winding-up petition could not proceed. The court dismissed the winding-up petition and related application, highlighting that arbitration was the appropriate forum for resolving the dispute.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2014 19:08:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=150968" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (10) TMI 526 - HIGH COURT OF MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113962</link>
      <description>The winding-up petition was found not maintainable as the petitioner had initiated arbitration proceedings, indicating a genuine dispute over the debt. The court emphasized the need for the debt to be determined and recognized the respondent&#039;s substantial and bona fide defense. Referring to legal precedents, the court held that since arbitration had commenced, the winding-up petition could not proceed. The court dismissed the winding-up petition and related application, highlighting that arbitration was the appropriate forum for resolving the dispute.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113962</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>