https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113956 The Court allowed the petition under section 560(6) of the Companies Act, directing the Registrar to restore the petitioner-Company's name in the Register of Companies. The Court found merit in the petitioner's case due to the Company's ongoing business activities, fixed assets, and cash balance. Despite the respondent Registrar's lack of opposition, the Court deemed it just to restore the Company's name as if it was never struck off, emphasizing the interest of justice. The petitioner was instructed to furnish a certified copy of the order to the Registrar for implementation, with no costs awarded. en-us Wed, 07 Oct 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 09 May 2012 14:36:41 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113956 The Court allowed the petition under section 560(6) of the Companies Act, directing the Registrar to restore the petitioner-Company's name in the Register of Companies. The Court found merit in the petitioner's case due to the Company's ongoing business activities, fixed assets, and cash balance. Despite the respondent Registrar's lack of opposition, the Court deemed it just to restore the Company's name as if it was never struck off, emphasizing the interest of justice. The petitioner was instructed to furnish a certified copy of the order to the Registrar for implementation, with no costs awarded. Case-Laws Companies Law Wed, 07 Oct 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113956