<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (6) TMI 544 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113954</link>
    <description>Exemption under Notification No. 276/92-Customs was available for imported Chapter 90 goods used in the renovation or modernisation of a fertilizer plant when the notification&#039;s substantive conditions were met. Techno-economic clearance for the project had been granted by the Ministry of Chemicals and Fertilizers, and the required list of goods was certified by the competent ministry officer. A clarification confirmed that the certifying officer was of Deputy Secretary rank, satisfying the notification requirement. On that basis, the exemption could not be denied on a technical objection, and duty paid at clearance was refundable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Jun 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 May 2012 14:33:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=150960" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (6) TMI 544 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113954</link>
      <description>Exemption under Notification No. 276/92-Customs was available for imported Chapter 90 goods used in the renovation or modernisation of a fertilizer plant when the notification&#039;s substantive conditions were met. Techno-economic clearance for the project had been granted by the Ministry of Chemicals and Fertilizers, and the required list of goods was certified by the competent ministry officer. A clarification confirmed that the certifying officer was of Deputy Secretary rank, satisfying the notification requirement. On that basis, the exemption could not be denied on a technical objection, and duty paid at clearance was refundable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Jun 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113954</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>