<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (9) TMI 592 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113952</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court held that the arbitration agreement survives termination of the contract due to breach and that the trial court must refer parties to arbitration under Section 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The court emphasized that once the conditions for referral to arbitration are met, the court has no discretion but to make the referral. The appeal was allowed, and the case was remanded for further proceedings in accordance with the Court&#039;s findings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Sep 2013 14:08:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=150958" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (9) TMI 592 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113952</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court held that the arbitration agreement survives termination of the contract due to breach and that the trial court must refer parties to arbitration under Section 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The court emphasized that once the conditions for referral to arbitration are met, the court has no discretion but to make the referral. The appeal was allowed, and the case was remanded for further proceedings in accordance with the Court&#039;s findings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113952</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>