<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (6) TMI 542 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113951</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held in favor of the appellants, finding that they had complied with the conditions of the exemption notification and the Board&#039;s Circular. The demand of Rs. 80,59,021/- was deemed unsustainable as the set-off credit was correctly availed and utilized. Additionally, the demand was barred by limitation, and the imposition of penalty was deemed unjustified. Consequently, the Commissioner&#039;s order was overturned.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Jun 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 May 2012 13:42:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=150957" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (6) TMI 542 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113951</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held in favor of the appellants, finding that they had complied with the conditions of the exemption notification and the Board&#039;s Circular. The demand of Rs. 80,59,021/- was deemed unsustainable as the set-off credit was correctly availed and utilized. Additionally, the demand was barred by limitation, and the imposition of penalty was deemed unjustified. Consequently, the Commissioner&#039;s order was overturned.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Jun 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113951</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>