<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (9) TMI 591 - HIGH COURT OF MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113950</link>
    <description>The court set aside the auction sale conducted by the Recovery Officer and ordered a fresh sale with the official liquidator&#039;s involvement. The auction purchaser was entitled to a refund, and a new valuation by court-appointed valuers was mandated for a fair price. Procedural formalities were to be followed, ensuring transparency and fairness in the sale of the company&#039;s assets. All original side appeals were allowed, overturning the single judge&#039;s order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2014 14:25:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=150956" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (9) TMI 591 - HIGH COURT OF MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113950</link>
      <description>The court set aside the auction sale conducted by the Recovery Officer and ordered a fresh sale with the official liquidator&#039;s involvement. The auction purchaser was entitled to a refund, and a new valuation by court-appointed valuers was mandated for a fair price. Procedural formalities were to be followed, ensuring transparency and fairness in the sale of the company&#039;s assets. All original side appeals were allowed, overturning the single judge&#039;s order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113950</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>