<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (9) TMI 590 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113948</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court upheld the arbitrator&#039;s award in a case where the High Court disallowed a portion of the claim related to compensation for loss of profit. The Court emphasized the importance of not substituting its view for that of the arbitrator as long as the arbitrator acts within jurisdiction. The Court found the arbitrator&#039;s reasons for the award to be reasonable and based on the evidence presented, leading to the decision to set aside the High Court&#039;s judgment and allow the appeal without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Aug 2013 10:42:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=150954" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (9) TMI 590 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113948</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court upheld the arbitrator&#039;s award in a case where the High Court disallowed a portion of the claim related to compensation for loss of profit. The Court emphasized the importance of not substituting its view for that of the arbitrator as long as the arbitrator acts within jurisdiction. The Court found the arbitrator&#039;s reasons for the award to be reasonable and based on the evidence presented, leading to the decision to set aside the High Court&#039;s judgment and allow the appeal without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113948</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>