<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (6) TMI 539 - CESTAT,  MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113946</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai upheld the penalty imposed by the Commissioner for taking credit suo motu without proper authorization under the Central Excise Rules, 1944. The appellants failed to challenge the orders directing them to return the amount taken as credit, leading to the confirmation of the penalty. The Tribunal emphasized the necessity of following due process and challenging official orders through legal channels to avoid unauthorized actions and penalties.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Jun 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 May 2012 13:39:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=150952" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (6) TMI 539 - CESTAT,  MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113946</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai upheld the penalty imposed by the Commissioner for taking credit suo motu without proper authorization under the Central Excise Rules, 1944. The appellants failed to challenge the orders directing them to return the amount taken as credit, leading to the confirmation of the penalty. The Tribunal emphasized the necessity of following due process and challenging official orders through legal channels to avoid unauthorized actions and penalties.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Jun 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113946</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>