<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (9) TMI 589 - HIGH COURT OF KERALA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113945</link>
    <description>The Court held that the Company Petition was not maintainable due to the availability of other efficacious remedies under the Companies Act. The petition for winding up was dismissed without prejudice to the petitioners&#039; right to pursue other appropriate remedies for their grievances. The Court did not delve into the merits of the factual contentions raised by the petitioners.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 Nov 2014 12:04:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=150951" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (9) TMI 589 - HIGH COURT OF KERALA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113945</link>
      <description>The Court held that the Company Petition was not maintainable due to the availability of other efficacious remedies under the Companies Act. The petition for winding up was dismissed without prejudice to the petitioners&#039; right to pursue other appropriate remedies for their grievances. The Court did not delve into the merits of the factual contentions raised by the petitioners.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113945</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>