https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113942 Mandatory individual notice under section 9(3) of the Land Acquisition Act, read with section 9(4), was required before the Collector could proceed to award land belonging to a company in liquidation, and service had to be effected on the company in the manner required by law. The absence of such notice vitiated the acquisition enquiry as against the company. On compensation, the text applies parity with similarly acquired adjacent land and states that, where a consent award had fixed a higher rate for comparable land in the same acquisition, compensation for the company's land could be re-determined at that rate. The differential amount was directed to be paid. en-us Fri, 11 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 01 Nov 2014 12:46:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113942 Mandatory individual notice under section 9(3) of the Land Acquisition Act, read with section 9(4), was required before the Collector could proceed to award land belonging to a company in liquidation, and service had to be effected on the company in the manner required by law. The absence of such notice vitiated the acquisition enquiry as against the company. On compensation, the text applies parity with similarly acquired adjacent land and states that, where a consent award had fixed a higher rate for comparable land in the same acquisition, compensation for the company's land could be re-determined at that rate. The differential amount was directed to be paid. Case-Laws Companies Law Fri, 11 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113942