<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (9) TMI 580 - HIGH COURT OF MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113920</link>
    <description>The court held that the respondent&#039;s demand for stamp duty was ultra vires the Registration Act, 1908, and quashed the impugned order. The court directed the respondent to file the copy of the sale certificate in Book No. 1 without requiring stamp duty, as per Sections 17(2)(xii) and 89. The writ petition was allowed, and the court emphasized the need for legislative amendments to address the exemption&#039;s impact on state revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2014 11:58:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=150926" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (9) TMI 580 - HIGH COURT OF MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113920</link>
      <description>The court held that the respondent&#039;s demand for stamp duty was ultra vires the Registration Act, 1908, and quashed the impugned order. The court directed the respondent to file the copy of the sale certificate in Book No. 1 without requiring stamp duty, as per Sections 17(2)(xii) and 89. The writ petition was allowed, and the court emphasized the need for legislative amendments to address the exemption&#039;s impact on state revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113920</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>