<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (9) TMI 577 - HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113912</link>
    <description>The High Court of Gujarat sanctioned a Scheme of Amalgamation involving multiple companies, including Khurana Builders Pvt. Ltd., after finding compliance with necessary procedures under the Companies Act. The court dispensed with shareholder and creditor meetings, as consent letters were provided, and noted no objections or prejudicial conduct. The Central Government did not oppose the petitions, leading to approval of the scheme and quantification of costs for the Central Government and Official Liquidator, with payment instructions for petitioner-companies. The petitions were allowed, and the court approved the minutes of the meetings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 Nov 2014 18:08:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=150918" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (9) TMI 577 - HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113912</link>
      <description>The High Court of Gujarat sanctioned a Scheme of Amalgamation involving multiple companies, including Khurana Builders Pvt. Ltd., after finding compliance with necessary procedures under the Companies Act. The court dispensed with shareholder and creditor meetings, as consent letters were provided, and noted no objections or prejudicial conduct. The Central Government did not oppose the petitions, leading to approval of the scheme and quantification of costs for the Central Government and Official Liquidator, with payment instructions for petitioner-companies. The petitions were allowed, and the court approved the minutes of the meetings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113912</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>