<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (6) TMI 516 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113910</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Chennai addressed the denial of Modvat credit under Rule 57Q for capital goods, particularly focusing on a &quot;Ring Frame.&quot; After a detailed examination of ownership and transfer of property in the capital goods, including the &quot;Ring Frame&quot; procured through a loan, the Tribunal allowed the application, granting waiver of predeposit and stay of recovery for the entire disputed Modvat credit amount. Legal interpretations emphasized ownership, transfer of property, and the applicability of relevant rules and precedents, leading to a favorable outcome for the appellants.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Jun 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 May 2012 11:50:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=150916" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (6) TMI 516 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113910</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Chennai addressed the denial of Modvat credit under Rule 57Q for capital goods, particularly focusing on a &quot;Ring Frame.&quot; After a detailed examination of ownership and transfer of property in the capital goods, including the &quot;Ring Frame&quot; procured through a loan, the Tribunal allowed the application, granting waiver of predeposit and stay of recovery for the entire disputed Modvat credit amount. Legal interpretations emphasized ownership, transfer of property, and the applicability of relevant rules and precedents, leading to a favorable outcome for the appellants.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Jun 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113910</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>