https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113905 A tribunal cannot insist on full pre-deposit where an earlier HC order had already granted dispensation on specified instalment terms and expressly extended that relief to all connected appeals. Compliance with the instalment schedule placed on record showed that the connected appeal was governed by the binding earlier direction, so the later order refusing dispensation could not stand. The HC set aside the impugned order and directed that the appeal proceed on merits without insisting on deposit of the entire penalty amount. en-us Tue, 25 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 09 May 2012 11:42:06 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113905 A tribunal cannot insist on full pre-deposit where an earlier HC order had already granted dispensation on specified instalment terms and expressly extended that relief to all connected appeals. Compliance with the instalment schedule placed on record showed that the connected appeal was governed by the binding earlier direction, so the later order refusing dispensation could not stand. The HC set aside the impugned order and directed that the appeal proceed on merits without insisting on deposit of the entire penalty amount. Case-Laws FEMA Tue, 25 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113905