https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113895 The Court upheld the decision of the Single Judge, dismissing the petition to wind up the respondent-company under the Companies Act. It found that there was a genuine dispute regarding the liability of the respondent, particularly concerning the authenticity of the guarantee deed and agreement. The Court concluded that the documents presented were insufficient to establish the respondent's liability, directing the parties to bear their own costs. en-us Wed, 12 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 03 Nov 2014 13:13:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113895 The Court upheld the decision of the Single Judge, dismissing the petition to wind up the respondent-company under the Companies Act. It found that there was a genuine dispute regarding the liability of the respondent, particularly concerning the authenticity of the guarantee deed and agreement. The Court concluded that the documents presented were insufficient to establish the respondent's liability, directing the parties to bear their own costs. Case-Laws Companies Law Wed, 12 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113895