<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (5) TMI 495 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113889</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai denied project import benefit to the appellants for an injection moulding machine not installed at the approved plant location in Nashik but at another plant in Nagpur. The Tribunal cited a previous case where project import benefit was specific to the approved unit and location. Despite the appellants&#039; claim of DGTD permission for a new plant in Nagpur, the appeal was rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 May 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 May 2012 10:29:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=150895" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (5) TMI 495 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113889</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai denied project import benefit to the appellants for an injection moulding machine not installed at the approved plant location in Nashik but at another plant in Nagpur. The Tribunal cited a previous case where project import benefit was specific to the approved unit and location. Despite the appellants&#039; claim of DGTD permission for a new plant in Nagpur, the appeal was rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 May 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113889</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>