<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (5) TMI 486 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113877</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, a manufacturer facing duty demand due to lost molasses during storage, allowing Modvat credit on the full quantity of input, including lost molasses. The Tribunal cited a circular permitting a normal loss of up to 2%, supporting the appellant&#039;s claim. Additionally, the Tribunal criticized the lower authorities for adjusting the demand amount from rebate claims before the appeal time limit expired, violating the appellant&#039;s right to appeal and obtain a stay of recovery. The Tribunal ordered the immediate return of the recovered amount to rectify the procedural violation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 May 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 May 2012 18:46:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=150883" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (5) TMI 486 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113877</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, a manufacturer facing duty demand due to lost molasses during storage, allowing Modvat credit on the full quantity of input, including lost molasses. The Tribunal cited a circular permitting a normal loss of up to 2%, supporting the appellant&#039;s claim. Additionally, the Tribunal criticized the lower authorities for adjusting the demand amount from rebate claims before the appeal time limit expired, violating the appellant&#039;s right to appeal and obtain a stay of recovery. The Tribunal ordered the immediate return of the recovered amount to rectify the procedural violation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 May 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113877</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>