<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (5) TMI 483 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113872</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, New Delhi upheld the decision to credit the refund amount to the Consumer Welfare Fund in a case involving a refund claim related to rejected inputs. The appellants, engaged in the manufacture of motor vehicles, failed to demonstrate that they did not pass on the duty incidence to the buyers, leading to the application of the doctrine of unjust enrichment. The Tribunal found no illegality in the impugned order and dismissed the appeal, affirming the application of the doctrine of unjust enrichment to the refund claim.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 May 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 May 2012 18:28:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=150878" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (5) TMI 483 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113872</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, New Delhi upheld the decision to credit the refund amount to the Consumer Welfare Fund in a case involving a refund claim related to rejected inputs. The appellants, engaged in the manufacture of motor vehicles, failed to demonstrate that they did not pass on the duty incidence to the buyers, leading to the application of the doctrine of unjust enrichment. The Tribunal found no illegality in the impugned order and dismissed the appeal, affirming the application of the doctrine of unjust enrichment to the refund claim.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 May 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113872</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>