https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113869 The court dismissed the application to recall the order dated July 5, 1999, emphasizing the need to establish fraud with specific particulars. The court held that the applicants' voluntary concession to the order could not be overturned solely based on allegations of fraud without concrete evidence. The shares held by the Registrar were directed to be transferred to the petitioner, as there was no illegality or compulsion in the applicants' consent to the order. en-us Thu, 30 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 04 Nov 2014 15:08:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113869 The court dismissed the application to recall the order dated July 5, 1999, emphasizing the need to establish fraud with specific particulars. The court held that the applicants' voluntary concession to the order could not be overturned solely based on allegations of fraud without concrete evidence. The shares held by the Registrar were directed to be transferred to the petitioner, as there was no illegality or compulsion in the applicants' consent to the order. Case-Laws Companies Law Thu, 30 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113869