<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (4) TMI 489 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113865</link>
    <description>Admissions by the persons concerned that goods were cleared without payment of duty and without Central Excise documents supported the confirmed demand and penalty for alleged clandestine removal. No defence was filed despite opportunity, and the record contained no material to dislodge the findings. On that basis, the demand and penalty were upheld and the appeal was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Apr 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 May 2012 18:16:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=150871" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (4) TMI 489 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113865</link>
      <description>Admissions by the persons concerned that goods were cleared without payment of duty and without Central Excise documents supported the confirmed demand and penalty for alleged clandestine removal. No defence was filed despite opportunity, and the record contained no material to dislodge the findings. On that basis, the demand and penalty were upheld and the appeal was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Apr 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113865</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>