<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (4) TMI 484 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113858</link>
    <description>Modvat credit on caustic soda lye could not be denied where the Department failed to prove that the recorded soda loss was a short receipt before manufacture rather than a process loss in producing calcined alumina. The assessee&#039;s import, storage, transfer and issue records, including material transfer advices and duty-paying documents, supported a disclosed accounting system, while earlier proceedings on the same allegations had already been dropped after verification. A later audit report, without authenticated material, could not by itself displace those findings or fix binding consumption norms. The Department did not discharge the initial burden of proving ineligible loss, and the principle that exact one-to-one correlation between input and final product is unnecessary supported allowance of credit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Apr 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Jul 2016 10:22:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=150864" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (4) TMI 484 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113858</link>
      <description>Modvat credit on caustic soda lye could not be denied where the Department failed to prove that the recorded soda loss was a short receipt before manufacture rather than a process loss in producing calcined alumina. The assessee&#039;s import, storage, transfer and issue records, including material transfer advices and duty-paying documents, supported a disclosed accounting system, while earlier proceedings on the same allegations had already been dropped after verification. A later audit report, without authenticated material, could not by itself displace those findings or fix binding consumption norms. The Department did not discharge the initial burden of proving ineligible loss, and the principle that exact one-to-one correlation between input and final product is unnecessary supported allowance of credit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Apr 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113858</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>