https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113849 The High Court upheld the Company Law Board's decision to restore the respondent as Director and reinstate his original shareholding. The Court found the appellants failed to prove proper notice service for Board meetings, leading to acts of oppression and mismanagement against the respondent. The compliance issue with Section 400 of the Companies Act was not considered fatal to the proceedings. en-us Fri, 17 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 05 Nov 2014 12:42:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113849 The High Court upheld the Company Law Board's decision to restore the respondent as Director and reinstate his original shareholding. The Court found the appellants failed to prove proper notice service for Board meetings, leading to acts of oppression and mismanagement against the respondent. The compliance issue with Section 400 of the Companies Act was not considered fatal to the proceedings. Case-Laws Companies Law Fri, 17 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113849